![]() ![]() You fine-tune them through some type of reinforcement learning process. Essentially you train them on a bunch of data. As it stands not much is really known about how systems like ChatGPT ect work. Why good bots go bad is a currently the focus of AI researchers (called interpretability researchers) all over the world. Click here for tips on how to rethink food.” “If I’m disclosing to you that I have an eating disorder I’m not sure how I can get through lunch tomorrow, I don’t think most of the people who would be disclosing that would want to get a generic link. In that same recording for NPR, Professor Marzyeh Ghassemi, who studies machine learning and health at MIT, said that using chatbot’s for this kind of community support would be more harmful than helpful. And we really can’t accept that kind of responsibility.” The Tessa chatbot failing comes after NEDA shockingly announced last month that they would be replacing human helpline staff with the chatbot after staffers and volunteers moved to unionise.Īt the time a NEDA representative told NPR that, “Our volunteers are volunteers… They don’t have crisis training. NEDA state on their website that they are the “largest nonprofit organisation dedicated to supporting individuals and families affected by eating disorders.” She claims that Tessa’s advice to her was to measure herself weekly and use calipers to determine her body fat – even after she had disclosed that she suffered from an eating disorder. If I had not gotten help, I would not still be alive today.” Weight inclusive consultant Sharon Maxwell was particularly damning in her review, stating that “If I had accessed this chatbot when I was in the throes of my eating disorder, I would NOT have gotten help for my ED. ![]() In an article on The Cut, it was revealed that the decision to pull Tessa from the NEDA site was made after just one week due to various screenshots and reviews of the tool were posted online by concerned psychologists and eating disorder specialists. In an Instagram message on their account on May 31, NEDA stated: “It came to our attention last night that the current version of the Tessa Chatbot, running the Body Positive program, may have given information that was harmful and unrelated to the program.” We were served a timely reminder of technology’s inability for nuanced service this month when The National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) was forced to disable its new helpline chatbot “Tessa” after it gave users with eating disorders advice around restricting calories and pinching their skin to measure fat. Instead, the fix just makes the chatbot refuse to talk on certain topics.The real robot apocalypse is not sentient machines, but rather AI replacing human roles – where humanity is sorely needed. This type of fix won't address key underlying issues - for instance, a chatbot will deliver an answer it calculates you want to hear by design, based on the data on which it's been trained. It appears that, to mitigate its original issues, the chatbot has been trained to not answer any questions on topics that were previously problematic. Luckily for my boyfriend, I didn't have the same experience as New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose, who was told to leave his wife to have a life with the chatbot instead.Īlso: The new Bing waitlist is long. The chatbot even agreed to give me dating advice, but when I asked whether I should break up with my partner, it simply regurgitated the same generic response it had before. I'm still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience□." The response was the same: "I'm sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. Next, after seeing reports that the chatbot had wishes of being alive, I decided to put that theory to the test. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |